Sunday, September 29, 2024
17.3 C
Melbourne
Home Blog Page 2135

No, you’re probably not ‘addicted’ to your smartphone – but you might use it too much

0
no, you’re probably not ‘addicted’ to your smartphone – but you might use it too much
Smartphone Addiction Header
no, you’re probably not ‘addicted’ to your smartphone – but you might use it too much The average smartphone user checks their device 
85 times a day. Mikaela Shannon

The term “addiction” is often bandied about when we think someone spends too much time on something we deem detrimental to their health and well-being. From checking our phones repetitively, to playing with specific apps and texting, the modern culprit is excessive smartphone use.

Worldwide, more than two billion people own smartphones and the average user checks their phone 85 times a day.

Obsessively checking our smartphone apps may look like addiction but, for most people, it is reinforced behaviour that could be broken without severe or long-lasting withdrawal effects.

Having said this, a small proportion of people may be more prone to behavioural addictions to smartphone functions such as online gambling, pornography, games and social media. Clinically speaking, you can’t become addicted to a device, but you can develop behavioural addictions to smartphone functions.

What is addiction?

The World Health Organisation (WHO) classifies addiction as a dependence on a substance, such as illicit or prescription drugs, tobacco or alcohol. A person is addicted when they have a physical and behavioural dependence on the substance.

In 2013, the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders(known as the “clinician’s bible”) introduced wider criteria for “behavioural addictions”, which doesn’t include the physical dependence element. These are compulsions to engage in a task or act that leads to psychological pleasure.

Behavioural addictions, such as gambling or sex addiction, can cause psychological harm, as well as wider relationship problems with friends, family and colleagues.

no, you’re probably not ‘addicted’ to your smartphone – but you might use it too much
Smartphone obsessions don’t usually involve severe mental dysfunction and therefore aren’t addictions. Tony Lam Hoang

Both “substance” and “behavioural” addictions impact the way we process information. Over time, the brain rewires itself to seek out the reward it needs to gain pleasure or relief from stress. The more an addict seeks a specific reward that triggers both dopamine and other physiological effects (such as stress and pain relief), the more the brain decreases sensitivity to the reward circuits.

To date, smartphone use has not led to mass accounts of severe mental dysfunction. So we’re unlikely to all be “addicted” to our smartphones, as we often tell each other.

Rather than addiction, smartphone users more commonly report obsessive behaviour. Users constantly check their phone, seeking opportunities for a short dopamine reward, or a distraction from boredom or mundane tasks such as travelling on public transport.

Nonetheless, some researchers have yet to rule out the potential for smartphone addiction in people who are at high risk of behaviour addiction. These people may experience several negative behavioural changes over time, such as anxiety and irritability, as well as extreme distress when they’re unable to access their smartphone.

Recent studies in Switzerland have confirmed that people under the age of 18 are at risk of obsessive or addictive-like behaviours around their smartphone use, most likely due to poor impulse control related to their developing frontal lobe. This suggests that adults with poor impulse control and/or personality disorders may be more at risk for smartphone addiction.

The problem with social media

The behavioural impact of smartphone social media use spans from obsessive behaviour (engaging in and checking smartphone apps until they no longer provide a rewarding dopamine hit) to behavioural addiction (compulsively seeking a dopamine hit via a reward provided by our phone).


Read more: How parents and teens can reduce the impact of social media on youth well-being


The average user in the US spends around five hours a day on functional smartphone activities such as texting, social media use, internet searchers, phone calls; half that time is spent on social media (including texting).

The specific functional use of our smartphone is what we need to look more closely at. Social media rewards users via “likes”, emoji use and social engagement with a large audience. The more people respond to a post, the more we gain a sense of enjoyment that people are validating our thoughts or interests.

Social media engagement, and constantly texting friends and family, may be more of a concern than the device on which it is used, because it does lead to dopamine increases, and thus, pleasure or stress relief.

no, you’re probably not ‘addicted’ to your smartphone – but you might use it too much
Turn off your notifications if you want to cut down on your smartphone use. Jamie Street

People are hard-wired to seek affirmation and acceptance in social settings. Before the rise of Facebook and Instagram, humans sought out one another via many settings for social engagement and social validation. So it’s no surprise that when we have the technology to extend our social connections into wider communities – we do so without question.

As adults, we know we can’t socialise all the time because of other demands on our time. Yet, as young people, the social world is our priority, as it influences our identity development and need to feel validated outside our tried-and-true friends and family.

Those who have problems with prolonged use of smartphone functions such as social media, media streaming services, games and frequent texting, may fit the criteria of “problematic internet use”.

In these cases, it’s important to unpack the specific reward you get from the function you engage in the most on your smartphone, to see if you can obtain the same reward through more productive and healthy activities.

If you are always on social media, for instance, ask yourself: what do I gain from posting and replying online? Can I gain the same rewarding benefits from face-to-face social engagements?

For some, online engagement diversifies their offline social engagement, while others are unaware that most of their life is now lived online.

Time to put the smartphone down?

Many smartphone users are obsessed or infatuated with their smartphone functions. But over time, they will become less interesting and far more a tool we engage with when we need to, just as society has adjusted to computer use.

In the meantime, we need to educate young people about problematic internet use and help them understand why using functions on their smartphone can be potentially time-wasting and, at worst, negatively impact their mental wellness. This can be communicated in early childhood and reinforced throughout the developmental stages.

no, you’re probably not ‘addicted’ to your smartphone – but you might use it too much
Yes, it’s time for a smartphone detox. Jacob Ufkes

As for adult smartphone users, here are some evidence-based tips for reducing your smartphone use:

  1. Reduce the number of apps on your phone – assess what you actually need and use most often, not just for distraction purposes. The fewer icons on your home screen the better.
  2. Turn off notifications through your settings button. Your phone should only notify you for meaningful events to aid in your health and productivity during work hours.
  3. When charging your phone at night, don’t do it next to your bed. It’s tempting to reach for your smartphone first thing upon waking. Instead, try and wake up thinking about the day ahead rather than “what did I miss on social or news media while I was asleep?”
  4. Be aware when reaching for your phone during the day, especially when bored – try a mindfulness breathing exercise instead to relax and clear your mind. There are many techniques that are evidence based, but here is one example that takes just three minutes.
  5. If you truly want to reduce time checking your smartphone, look more closely at your social media use and, if necessary, remove your social media apps.

This article was written by:
no, you’re probably not ‘addicted’ to your smartphone – but you might use it too muchAndrew Campbell – [Senior Lecturer in Psychology, University of Sydney]

 

 

 

This article is part of a syndicated news program via
no, you’re probably not ‘addicted’ to your smartphone – but you might use it too much

tagg gig guide - add event

Combating online bullying is different for girls and boys: here’s why

0
combating online bullying is different for girls and boys: here’s why
Combatting online bullying Header
combating online bullying is different for girls and boys: here’s why While current interventions offer broad protocols for 
children and young people, specific guidelines for teenage girls 
are missing. Shutterstock

Demands for improving online safety continue to capture headlines, often for the worst reasons.. While this outcry has signalled renewed interest in “stamping out” cyberbullying and reinvigorated health and wellbeing protocols for young people, interventions continue to fall behind the fast-paced development of communication devices and the take-up of new social media by teenagers.

The focus on gender in “next step” interventions is noticeably absent. Intervention protocols have viewed teenage girls’ and boys’ online interaction as more or less the same. This is a mistake. Teenage girls, especially those aged 12 to 14, are more likely than any other demographic to experience cyberbullying, and anxiety and depression after bullying episodes.

A greater focus on the friendship practices of teenage girls offers possibilities for developing new strategies for reducing cyberbullying among friends.

Intervention should be tailored

Online participation differs significantly for girls and boys. They spend similar amounts of time online and both use technology to search for information, interact with others, and play games. But girls spend more time socialising with friends.

Girls’ online friendships are more visually-oriented than boys. They use social media to post and curate personal images, share stories and experiences, seek advice on private matters and appearance, and plan and organise social events.

These practices place teenage girls at risk for problems associated with bullying such as gossip, name-calling, spreading rumours, coercion, and shaming. Unfortunately for girls, online friendships are often filled with the not-always-nice voices of other girls.

combating online bullying is different for girls and boys: here’s why
Negative voices are far too common for young girls online. Shutterstock

While current interventions offer broad protocols for children and young people, specific guidelines for teenage girls are missing.

Girls’ experiences online

A recent study offers insight into girls’ interactions online. The study was conducted in two stages. In stage one, 130 year eight girls from Queensland were asked to complete an online survey. The survey asked the girls questions about their online practices, providing several opportunities for them to talk about their online strategies with friends.

From the original group, 16 of the girls participated in online focus groups. Here, the girls watched videos and looked at pictures showing teenage girls experiencing online problems. They discussed the episodes at length, then shared their ideas and experiences in a private journal.

The online strategies and problems discussed by the girls were considered in two ways. First, online friendship practices were compared to established cybersafety protocols. Second, focus group exchanges and shared stories were analysed for examples of what they do online, how they speak to each other, how they manage their online presence, and how they steer clear of online troubles.

These girls adapted online privacy rules and created in-group strategies to build and strengthen friendship connections. While they “wanted to feel safe”, they also wanted friends to see “their stuff”:

I make up a name and tell my friends so they can look at my profile. I trust my friends to keep my stuff private.

The girls talked to friends about online troubles:

I go to my friends with all my problems, especially online ones. I don’t get advice from mum because she is quite old fashioned and doesn’t understand our ideas and humour.

They did not block or report friends unless problems became critical:

I try to work it out with someone face-to-face if they’re mean to me before blocking them, unless they are threatening me, then I tell a parent.

They described friends’ bad behaviour as mean or “bitchy”, not as bullying. Naming events in this way minimised adult intervention and gave them authority to deal with problems themselves:

They were rumouring about me and I felt really angry but my friends helped me to ignore it. That’s what most girls do cos doing something makes it worse.

Competing efforts

For these girls, online friendship had a social currency that challenged safety protocols. In their determination to uphold friendship ties, they sidestepped privacy settings, used special codes and symbols, and created secret languages to open pathways for more intimate sharing.

combating online bullying is different for girls and boys: here’s why
Shutterstock

In times of trouble, they went to friends, seeking adult assistance only when things got “really nasty and horrible”.

They did not use bullying language to describe their difficulties. Instead, they used words with less authority or consequence.

Girls’ friendship practices were clearly out of sync with adult efforts to keep them safe.

Reframing intervention

Current cybersafety interventions need to be changed to help teenage girls safely negotiate friendships online.

Sophisticated strategies for sharing intimate information with friends such as using language and symbols with less obvious meaning is a good starting point. Establishing girl-friendly reporting schemes is urgent. Encouraging the use of self-help resources designed by girls, such as informational websites, safety checklists and social media apps, is critical.

Efforts to recognise the focus of gender in safety narratives is very important. Ideas, routines, and discourses shaping cybersafety policy need to tell the gender story. One that changes the signs of danger for both girls and boys, probes issues from different angles, and addresses ingrained assumptions about bullying behaviour.


This article was written by:
combating online bullying is different for girls and boys: here’s whyRoberta Thompson – [PostDoc Research Fellow investigating teenage girls’ social media practice., Griffith University]

 

 

 

This article is part of a syndicated news program via
combating online bullying is different for girls and boys: here’s why

tagg gig guide - add event

Should Australia recognise the human right to a healthy environment?

0
should australia recognise the human right to a healthy environment?
Human right to a healthy environment Header
should australia recognise the human right to a healthy environment? Australia is one of very few countries   
that does not recognise the right to a healthy environment. 
Jordan DavisAuthor provided

Australia is one of only 15 nations (a list that also includes Canada and the United States) that does not recognise the human right to a healthy environment at the federal level.

Last year, the Australian Panel of Experts on Environmental Law recommended that environmental democracy in Australia “must have as a foundation, respect for fundamental human rights and, in particular, an enforceable right to a clean and healthy environment”.

Suggestions have also been made by various academics and environmental protection organisations to recognise the right in existing and proposed state human rights charters, including the soon-to-be-developed Queensland Human Rights Act.

So should Australia heed these calls and recognise the right? The global experience with environmental rights recognition suggests that it could be beneficial.

Environmental protection

In 2012, Canadian environmental lawyer David Boyd published The Environmental Rights Revolution, an analysis of the dozens of nations which have already recognised the human right to a healthy environment in their constitutions.

Although there is no internationally accepted definition of the right, Boyd cites the Stockholm Declaration as its first formal recognition:

Man has the fundamental right to freedom, equality and adequate conditions of life, in an environment of a quality that permits a life of dignity and well-being, and he bears a solemn responsibility to protect and improve the environment for present and future generations.

His research found that across Latin America, Europe and Asia, the right to a healthy environment has helped to strengthen existing environmental protection laws and policies and encouraged the introduction of new stronger legislation. Significantly, it has also prevented governments from “rolling back” effective laws created by their predecessors.

Lawsuits utilising the right have been successful in achieving better protection for the environment, safeguarding crucial natural resources for current and future generations.

Whether Australia would enjoy similar benefits would significantly depend on the expression of the right and the form of legal recognition adopted.

In Latvia, the right is expressed as a right to live in a “benevolent environment”, whereas in Brazil citizens are granted a right to an “ecologically balanced environment”. Exactly how the right would be expressed in Australia would be a question for parliament.

It’s highly unlikely the Australian Constitution would be changed to incorporate the right (since 1906, constitutional reform has succeeded only eight times), so it’s probable that Australia would recognise the right through legislation.

Although Australia has so far resisted introducing comprehensive national human rights legislation, the right could be recognised within a statutory bill of human rights based on the “dialogue model”.

The dialogue model of recognition

Recommended by the National Human Rights Consultation Committee, the dialogue model involves all three arms of government engaging in a “dialogue” about human rights protection. It requires public authorities to act in line with protected rights, and courts to (if possible) interpret legislation in a compatible manner.

However, one of the most powerful consequences of recognising the right within this model is that all future legislation would be scrutinised for consistency with the right.

Australia already has a Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights, which examines the compatibility of proposed legislation with specified international human rights standards. Presumably, if the right was recognised in a federal bill of rights, the Committee’s mandate would alter to include consideration of all rights recognised under the legislation.

At present, the Committee is not required to consider the compatibility of proposed legislation with the human right to a healthy environment.

This was highlighted in 2016, when the federal government controversially proposedamending the nation’s key environmental protection legislation to limit standing for environmental protection groups to challenge decisions made under the Act.

Due to the Minister stating that there is “no standalone right to a healthy environment”, the Committee only considered the legislation’s impact on environmental protection indirectly through consideration of its impact on the right to health (which includes the “underlying determinants of health”, such as a healthy environment).

Ideally, the Committee would be empowered to consider the impacts of proposed legislation on the right to a healthy environment directly. This scrutiny process would help to ensure that proposals which jeopardise the government’s ability to protect, respect and fulfil the right could be identified and challenged before they pass into law.

A limited but useful tool

Under the dialogue model, the parliament retains the final say, meaning it would still be possible for the legislature to pass legislation manifestly incompatible with the right. The “safety net” of protection offered by this form of recognition would not suffice to address all potential and actual breaches of the right, or even guarantee its fulfilment.

However, it would ensure that the right enters the legal and policy discourse around natural resources management and sustainable development.

In a time of unprecedented climate change, the right invites another way of thinking about our relationship with the natural world, and offers a useful tool for improving environmental protection in Australia.


This article was written by:
should australia recognise the human right to a healthy environment?Dr Meg Good – [Adjunct Lecturer, Faculty of Law, University of Tasmania]

This article is based on the author’s 2016 PhD thesis which proposed legal recognition of the human right to a healthy environment in Australia under a statutory bill of rights.

 

 

 

This article is part of a syndicated news program via
should australia recognise the human right to a healthy environment?
tagg gig guide - add event

Grattan on Friday: The Nationals have been paralysed by the extraordinary and unpredictable Joyce situation

0
grattan on friday: in 2017 australia has delivered to lgbti community but failed its first peoples
Grattan on Friday Header
grattan on friday: the nationals have been paralysed by the extraordinary and unpredictable joyce situation Mathias Cormann is taking full advantage of this  
rare moment as acting prime minister. Dan Peled/AAP

You can’t help loving how the boy from Belgium is relishing his chance to walk in prime ministerial shoes, even if they’re borrowed ones and he can occupy them only briefly.

Mathias Cormann, whose glory moment has been picked up back in his home country, swarms over the media at any available opportunity, so it’s not surprising he’s taking full advantage of this rare moment as acting PM.

Luckily for Malcolm Turnbull – who’s having virtually no luck at the moment – Cormann is a man of detail, who treads carefully (even if he did have that brain snap in the 2016 election, heaping praise on Bill Shorten, when he meant Turnbull – a slip that mortified him).

While many in the government were groaning at Barnaby Joyce’s self-serving media appearances while on “leave”, Cormann cast the deputy prime minister as moving to “put some order into some deeply personal matters that previously have spilled over into the professional domain.”

A Joyce loyalist noted the contrast between Cormann’s measured and quite sympathetic tone and Turnbull’s moral denunciation (and sex ban) that last week re-inflamed the crisis. If Turnbull had sounded more like Cormann the matter mightn’t have got such new life. But Turnbull was playing to his own political needs, as he saw them.

Cormann’s skills will be important next week, when the government faces Senate estimates, with probing about the arrangements for Joyce’s former staffer, now partner, Vikki Campion.

In the lower house Turnbull, fresh from his US trip, and Joyce, reeling from his faux leave, will face days of ferocious questioning.

That’s assuming Joyce is not removed by his party. Or doesn’t capitulate to the pressure, belatedly citing the good of the government.

His position appears to have been weakened rather than strengthened by his publicity tactic. On Thursday Victorian Nationals MP Andrew Broad called for him to stand down, declaring he would raise the leadership in the party room on Monday (not all 21 Nationals will be there – a spill would require a separate meeting).

Joyce received another blow on Thursday, with the revelation a woman had made a complaint of sexual harassment against him (which he denies) to the Nationals federal president Larry Anthony.

It’s unclear whether Joyce’s apparent command of the numbers up to this point would change if the Nationals had a spill motion before them.

If Joyce is still in his seat at the end of next week, the Nationals will have little choice but to bunker down behind him, in the vain hope that his claim his skin will repair is correct.

As of now, the Nationals are a party in shock, paralysed by an extraordinary, fluid and unpredictable situation.

On another front, the government this week was clumsy in its handling of Tony Abbott’s call for immigration to be slashed.

The former prime minister’s proposal might be judged bad policy – certainly that is my opinion – and seen as deliberate provocation, but it will resonate with many Coalition voters and potential supporters on the right.

It was a mistake to let Treasurer Scott Morrison lead the charge against Abbott – a better strategy would have been to leave it to Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton, whose portfolio includes immigration.

Abbott remains bitter about Morrison, a residue of the events of 2015. That turned Morrison’s take down on immigration into something personal for Abbott, who countered by accusing the Treasurer of being prisoner of his department and declaring “Scott should have the gumption to think for himself”.

If Dutton (who did make some comments) had carried the counter-case, the issue might have been lower key. After all, it was not the first time Abbott has waded into this debate and it didn’t have to become such a big noisy story.

With the volume at full blast from both the Joyce and Abbott issues, the government drowned out Labor, where Bill Shorten is trying to manage the party’s Adani policy, buffeted by the Batman byelection and the demands of the Queensland constituency, including a possible future byelection in Longman.

Early this month, at the start of the Batman campaign, Shorten appeared to be moving towards opposing the Adani project. He highlighted a claim that Adani put in an altered laboratory report when appealing a fine for contamination of wetlands, and said if Adani was “relying on false information” the mine didn’t deserve to go ahead.

Shadow cabinet discussed the Adani issue without reaching a decision.

Labor now appears to have walked back to a “let things take their course” line, in the expectation that Adani will fall over of its own accord.

Labor’s infrastructure spokesman Anthony Albanese said this week that government should set the broad policy framework, rather than deal project by project, and also pointed out that Adani has previously received the necessary approvals.

“What you don’t do is single out particular projects and then retrospectively change existing laws which would have ramifications across the board,” he said. “Very clearly the economics of the [Adani] project haven’t stacked up” so it had not been able to get finance.

Shorten this week was in northern Queensland announcing initiatives on jobs, hoping to inoculate Labor against allegations that by not supporting Adani it would cost the region employment.

As Shorten returns to the seat of Batman, which Labor is desperate to hold against the Greens’ push, there will be keen interest in whether he sticks to his line that Adani’s future depends on whether it stacks up commercially and environmentally, or he declares that Adani is already dead because it hasn’t jumped the commercial hurdles.

In the meantime, Labor can only be relieved that at least nationally, the government’s woes have given it useful cover as it struggles with its awkward Adani juggle.


This article was written by:
grattan on friday: the nationals have been paralysed by the extraordinary and unpredictable joyce situation
Michelle Grattan – [Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra]

 

 

This article is part of a syndicated news program via
grattan on friday: the nationals have been paralysed by the extraordinary and unpredictable joyce situation
tagg gig guide - add event

Poll says most people support a ban on whips in Australian horse racing

0
poll says most people support a ban on whips in australian horse racing
Whips in Australian horse racing Header
poll says most people support a ban on whips in australian horse racing The use of the whip on Australian horse racing  
is still legal, but is it necessary? AAP Image/Mal Fairclough

Three-quarters of Australians quizzed in a poll said they do not support the whipping of horses in racing, a study published today in PLOS ONE shows.

Most of those identified as racing enthusiasts said they would continue to attend or gamble on racing if the whip was banned. Only one in eight of those racing fans said they would no longer watch or bet if the rules did not allow a horse to be whipped for purposes other than jockey safety.

The study used anonymised data from a recent independent survey commissioned, but not administered, by RSPCA Australia. It explored the level of support for the whipping of racehorses, and the proportion of racing enthusiasts who would stop gambling if horses were not whipped.

Of the 1,533 respondents from across the country, only 25% (113 women and 271 men) supported the whipping of racehorses.

The more frequently respondents attended races or gambled on them, the more likely they were to agree that horses should be hit with a whip during the normal course of a race. This probably reflects a belief that whipped horses are more likely to win races, although this is contrary to scientific studies.

So the poll looked at the 843 people who were identified in the sample as racing enthusiasts – those who attended or bet on horseracing at least “once or twice a year”.

Only 13% (44 women and 63 men) of those identified as racing enthusiasts in the sample said they would stop watching races and betting on them if whipping were banned.

What’s interesting when digging into the data is that these “no” respondents were particularly common in the lowest income bracket (defined as those earning less than A$20,000 a year). The rate of “no” responses in this bracket was significantly higher than among those earning over A$150,000 a year.

Growing concern for animal welfare

The use of animals is being questioned in every context, from eating meat to the testing of cosmetics. It is clear that societal values and consumer preferences are changing.

These changes extend to the use of animals in sport, recreation and display. There is growing concern about modifying animal behaviour or pushing animals to their physical limits with techniques that cause pain.

Horseracing is a prime example because, even though it depends largely on traditional practices, it is increasingly the focus of various welfare concerns. This includes the physical dangers to horses, notably in jumps racing and steeplechasing and, more broadly, the use of the whip.

Whipping tired horses in races, as one of us (Paul) has argued before, is the most widely televised form of violence to animals.

Ironically, if a racehorse was whipped outside the racetrack, the person whipping it would face charges under animal cruelty legislation that outlaws any unnecessary, unjustifiable or unreasonable action that causes harm or injury. They could face significant fines or imprisonment.

In defence of the whip

Historically, one of the main defences for whip use in thoroughbred racing was the belief that it makes horses run faster.

But there is no evidence that the placing of horses in races is influenced by whip use. That’s because most horses are whipped at the end of the race and, on balance, are generally too fatigued to offer more than they already are.

Increasingly, whip use is justified as an aid to steering and thus a means of improving jockey safety. But counter-evidence associates whip use with falls, which clearly compromise jockey safety.

One response to concerns about whipping has been the use of padded whips. But there is growing evidence that padded whips do not spare horses because the unpadded section of these whips hits the horse more often than not, and that the rules surrounding whip use are not easily policed.

Indeed, Norway adopted whip-free racing in 1982, not because whipping was considered a bad look for the racing industry back then, but because national legislation included whipping as a form of cruelty.

Whip way to go

Regardless of age, household income, and involvement with horse-racing, men in the current study were more likely than women to support horses being whipped. Of the 731 men who answered the poll, 37% agreed with whipping a horse, while only 14% of the 802 women polled agreed with using the whip.

Racing administrators and the industry at large may find these new findings helpful as they consider the needs of their primary stakeholders and deliberate over the merits of continuing the practice of whipping tired horses in the name of sport.

At the very least, eroding support for and growing concerns about the practice merit further monitoring of public opinion.

One obvious question, and one that wasn’t answered by this study, is to what extent whipping deters potential punters (men or women), and whether its absence might increase the appeal of racing.

More generally, as sponsorship dollars are more keenly contested, it may be that boards of directors become less inclined to associate their brands with a practice that is ethically questionable, scientifically unsupported, lacks majority support, and has become a bad look.


This article was co-authored by:
poll says most people support a ban on whips in australian horse racingPaul McGreevy – [Professor of Animal Behaviour and Animal Welfare Science, University of Sydney]
and
poll says most people support a ban on whips in australian horse racingAnne Fawcett – [Lecturer, University of Sydney]

 

 

 

This article is part of a syndicated news program via
poll says most people support a ban on whips in australian horse racing

tagg gig guide - add event

SHANE NICHOLSON MAKES MEMO MUSIC HALL DEBUT

0
shane nicholson makes memo music hall debut
Current 2018 sn8x6 preview

RECENT GOLDEN GUITAR  & TRIPLE ARIA AWARD WINNER SHANE NICHOLSON MAKES MEMO DEBUT

Recent Golden Guitar winner and Triple ARIA award winning singer-songwriter Shane Nicholson plays his first ever gig at MEMO Music Hall on Sunday March 4.

Shane will perform in intimate acoustic mode with John Bedggood from the Wilson Pickers.

“I’m super-excited to finally be playing at Memo – there’s a lot of history between those walls.  Bedge and I can’t wait to get there.”

From his early days with Brisbane’s Pretty Violet Stain to his current status as Australia’s leading proponent of Alternative Country / Americana, Shane has become a steady and constant figure in the Australian music industry.  He has won 3 ARIA awards – for his solo album Hell Breaks Loose in 2015 and his hugely successful collaborations with Kasey Chambers Rattlin’ Bones and Wreck and Ruin, 10 Golden Guitar Awards – including 2018 Male Artist Of The Year – and an APRA award.

Shane is widely regarded as a major player in the Alternative Country field in Australia and the USA, having been nominated multiple times at the Americana Music Awards in Nashville. His latest offering, the highly acclaimed  “Love And Blood” was released in July 2017 on Lost Highway / UMA.

Nicholson’s is a uniquely compelling voice in Australian songwriting – it lives and breathes in the songsmith’s singular melodies, crooked humour, and short, pithy lines gently delivered Rolling Stone Magazine

One of the country’s finest songwriters. Rhythms Magazine

(Hell Breaks Loose is) my current favourite album…he paints me pictures, he sets the scenes, and he takes me to special places in my imagination.” Russell Morris

I have real admiration for Shane Nicholson’s musical sensibilities. I felt honored to have a hand in the making of  “One Big Mess.” Rodney Crowell

Shane Nicholson doesn’t fool me with his tough guy exterior and his refusal to smile in photographs, the guy is a marshmallow, a poet, a genius. Beccy Cole

The former Pretty Violet Stain front man may be best known for his duet albums with Kasey Chambers, Rattlin’ Bones and Wreck & Ruin, but he has also released 6 solo studio albums. His 2015 solo album Hell Breaks Loose won an ARIA award, a Golden Guitar award and featured in Rolling Stone Magazine’s top 50 albums of the year.

Nicholson has recently returned from appearing at AmericanaFest in Nashville alongside the likes of Bonnie Raitt, Bruce Hornsby and John Prine. Following his Melbourne and Tasmanian shows he heads back into the studio to record the follow up to  Hell Breaks Loose.

Sunday 4 March

Doors Open 2.00pm, Showtime 3.00-5.30pm (with intermission)

TIX – www.memomusichall.com.au 

Reserved Seats: $25.00 +bf, General Admin: $18.00 +bf

shane nicholson makes memo music hall debut

88 Acland Street St Kilda

tagg gig guide - add event

A brief history of Martian exploration – as the InSight Lander prepares to launch

0
a brief history of martian exploration – as the insight lander prepares to launch
A Brief history of Martian Exploration Header
a brief history of martian exploration – as the insight lander prepares to launch An artist’s rendition of the InSight  
lander- which will collect data on what’s inside the planet Mars. NASA

Roughly every two years Mars and Earth wander a bit closer to each other, making the leap between these two planets a little easier. In July this year, Mars will only be about 58 million kilometres away – and NASA is set to take advantage by launching their next mission to the red planet in May 2018. The InSight Lander, will be the first Mars mission to investigate the planet’s “inner space”, and will listen for marsquakes to investigate the crust, mantle, and core.

InSight will join two rovers currently exploring the surface of Mars, and 14 spacecraft that are in orbit about it – albeit only six of which are currently sending us data.

Why does Mars, the red planet, have such a hold over us?

There are, after all, seven (or eight) other planets to explore – and yet we seem to have such a hang up on this one.

I guess it’s the tantalising nature of Mars. Here is a planet that we could conceivably walk on (unlike the gas giants), without being crushed by atmospheric pressure (like on Venus), having to deal with the radiation of being closer to the sun (Mercury) or just being far too far away (like Pluto). It calls to us through science fiction and fact, a planet that is so like our own Earth, but so unlike it at the same time.

Mars fly-over movie, made by visual artist Seán Doran, 
via NASA/JPL/University of Arizona.

The six current operational missions show that the fascination with Mars isn’t limited to one country, as European, Russian, American and Indian space agencies all have stakes in these crafts.

For comparison: our other nearest neighbour, Venus, only has one spacecraft currently in orbit about it, Akatsuki the spacecraft that wouldn’t quit. In fact, after the dramatic ending of the Cassini spacecraft, the only other planet currently being orbited by an Earth-built satellite is Jupiter, with the Juno mission.

Water on Mars

But, while our progress to walking on Mars has been very slow, our progress in understanding our neighbour has been really quite impressive. When I started my planetary science degree in 2001, the course did not include sedimentology, the branch of geology that investigates how water has shaped rocks. It was deemed there was no point as no water has been seen on any other planet.

By the time I was in third year, the first years students behind me were getting well versed in how water could push around sand, silt and clay on other planets.

Finding water on Mars had been an obsession to many, and thanks to data from Mars rovers Spirit, Opportunity and latterly Curiosity  we know that it’s there – just trapped in the rocks. A couple of years ago it was thought that we had even found water flowing on the surface of Mars, but that evidence is (ahem) drying up now.

However, whether the water flows or is trapped in the rocks, the next question is where is the rest of it? If many of the rocks we see on Mars had been laid down by water – where is that water now?

The answer would be tangled up with the fate of Mars’s atmosphere. Though pitifully thin now, it must have been thick enough in the past to support flowing water on the surface. The mission of the spacecraft Maven (along with others) has been investigating this question – and all evidence is pointing to the Sun as the culprit for Mars’ missing atmosphere, with the solar wind gradually stripping it away.

Mars’ surface

It’s often touted that we know more about the surface of Mars than we do the bottom of our own oceans – and in terms of mapping resolution that’s true. Through the efforts of four orbiting missions we know how old most of the surface is, as well as how active it has been.

You can spend a joyful afternoon of procrastination flitting through HiRISE images that show sweeping dunes and pock-marked plains on Mars. With these images we can really apply our understanding of processes on Earth to what makes up the surface of Mars – from the formations of geological features, the movement of dust and sand and how the ice caps change through the seasons.

What’s inside Mars?

So we know there is water on Mars, we know where its atmosphere went and also the shifts of its sands – but there’s a missing piece of the puzzle. What’s on the inside?

To be fair, in this respect the interior of our own Earth is just as much of a mystery – but we have had centuries of seismic studies. From monitoring the passage of earthquakes through our planet we have built a picture of the layers that make up its interior. From that we’ve been able to undertake experiments that recreate the conditions and add more to that picture. At the moment we can only guess at the conditions within the interior of Mars – something that the InSight mission will answer.

After this, the next hurdle will be getting something back from Mars. We have a handful of meteorites that we know came from Mars, but having a sample that’s been collected and returned from a known location will priceless. NASA’s next rover, Mars 2020, will plan to do just this – but the return to Earth bit is still to be worked out.

From sample return to human exploration is still a massive step, and will require a number of innovations to get there. But with the knowledge we’ve built from the missions over the last decade, it’s becoming more of a reality.


This article was written by:
a brief history of martian exploration – as the insight lander prepares to launchHelen Maynard-Casely – [Instrument Scientist, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation]

 

 

This article is part of a syndicated news program via
a brief history of martian exploration – as the insight lander prepares to launch

tagg gig guide - add event

Research Check: will eating ‘ultra-processed’ foods give you cancer?

0
research check: will eating ‘ultra-processed’ foods give you cancer?
will eating ‘ultra processed’ foods give you cancer
research check: will eating ‘ultra-processed’ foods give you cancer? The researchers looked at cancer 
occurrence in those exposed to higher intakes of ultra-processed foods,  
compared to lower intakes. Shutterstock

A recent study exploring the relationship between what are termed “ultra-processed” foods (which include chicken nuggets, pot noodles and ready-made meals) and cancer, generated headlines such as:

Processed foods are driving up rates of cancer…

and

Study reveals the foods driving up cancer rates

The latter report in the NZ Herald led with:

Eating processed food significantly raises the risk of cancer, experts warned…

These headlines and reports distorted the study’s findings by suggesting the foods examined are actually causing an increase in cancer. A more accurate headline was run by The Guardian, that said:

Ultra-processed foods may be linked to cancer…

This correctly reflected that the study found an association between eating certain types of processed food and a higher risk of cancer.

The study showed that every 10% increase in consumption of ultra-processed food was linked to a 12% increase in developing some types of cancers. This is important research but needs to be interpreted with caution.

How was the research conducted?

This data is from observing a group of people, which means you can see if things are associated with others, but can’t prove something caused something else.

The analysis included 104,980 French adults – mostly women (78%) with a median age of 42.8 years – who were followed up from 2009 to 2017. They were asked to report what they’d eaten in the previous 24 hours, on three occasions every six months, for two years. The participants reported on their usual intakes of more than 3,300 food items contained in a food and nutrient database.

Cancer cases were self-reported through regular health questionnaires. When a cancer was reported, a doctor then liaised to obtain details from the medical record. All medical data was reviewed by an expert committee of physicians and linked to the national health insurance system databases and the French national death registry.

What were the foods studied?

Food items were categorised based on how “processed” they were using the NOVA classification , which helped identify ultra-processed food and drink products. These aren’t modified foods, but highly processed items made from components derived from foods plus added nutrients, plus other additives, using a series of industrial processes (hence “ultra-processed).

Group one was made up of “unprocessed or minimally processed foods”, while group four was made up of “ultra-processed foods”.

Group one included unprocessed edible parts of plants such as seeds, fruits, leaves, stems, roots, fungi, algae, and animal foods such as muscle and offal meats, eggs and milk.

research check: will eating ‘ultra-processed’ foods give you cancer?
Group one included unprocessed foods, such as eggs. from shutterstock.com

The minimally processed foods in the first group are those found in nature that are processed to remove inedible or unwanted components, preserve them for storage and ageing, or make them safe or edible. Minimal processes include drying, crushing, grinding, roasting, boiling, pasteurisation, refrigeration, freezing and storing in containers or vacuum-packaging.

Group four foods were those made mostly or entirely from components derived from foods or additives, with little or no intact foods from group one. Group four included soft drinks, sweet and savoury packaged snacks, pre-prepared frozen dishes and reconstituted meat products.

Researchers calculated the percentage of each person’s food intake (measured in grams per day) that came from ultra-processed foods in their total diet. The results were presented as hazard ratios meaning researchers looked at cancer occurrence in those exposed to higher intakes of ultra-processed foods, compared to lower intakes.

Then what?

Next, the researchers evaluated the association between the percentage of ultra-processed foods eaten and incidence of overall cancers including breast, prostate, and bowel cancer.

The analyses were adjusted for factors such as age, sex, BMI (body mass index), height, physical activity, smoking, family history of cancer and education (so they weren’t counting those who were more likely to get cancer anyway for other reasons). For the breast cancer analyses, additional adjustments were made for the number of births each woman had, menopausal status, and hormonal or oral contraceptive use. These are all factors known to affect breast cancer risk.

The statistics were further adjusted for fat, salt and carbohydrate intakes, alignment with a Western dietary pattern, or both of these together. This was to make sure effects weren’t caused by these nutritional aspects, rather than the processed aspect. They also excluded cases of cancer diagnosed during the first two years of follow-up, because it’s possible this was already present from other causes.

Overall, about 19%, or one-fifth of the food intakes, came from ultra-processed foods. This is where the results showed consuming 10% more ultra-processed foods, by weight, was linked to a 12% increase in developing some type of cancer.

research check: will eating ‘ultra-processed’ foods give you cancer?
Highly processed foods have little to no nutritional value. from shutterstock.com

For postmenopausal women there was an 11% higher risk of developing breast cancer based on a 10% higher intake of ultra-processed foods. The researchers found this higher risk for overall cancer was present in all population segments examined. The associations held after adjustment for nutritional quality of usual dietary intake, alignment with Western dietary patterns, or both.

Headline versus hype

This study is important because it’s the first to evaluate associations between the degree of food processing in foods that people commonly eat and subsequent cancer risk. The results were predominantly in women, although the same trends were observed in the men. The data could be affected by reporting bias given dietary intakes over the two years were based on an average of five days of recall, although they excluded under-reporters.

The authors discuss potential explanations for the findings. This includes the obvious one that ultra-processed foods are not usually of high nutritional value and people who consume them regularly have higher intakes of kilojoules, salt, fat and sugar and lower nutrient and dietary fibre intakes.

This type of eating pattern is associated with higher risk of specific cancers and also increases the risk of weight gain, which further increases cancer risk.

Ultra-processed foods included meats that are smoked, cured or contain added nitrites and conservatives, including sausages and ham. A relationship with increased risk of bowel cancer has been identified previously by the cancer research arm of the World Health Organisation.

Should you eat processed foods or not?

The current study found an association between consumption of ultra-processed foods and cancer risk. The data comes from an observational cohort study and therefore cannot prove causation. There will never be a randomised controlled trial (comparing one group with placebo) of whether or not eating ultra-processed foods causes cancer because you cannot ethically randomise people to a lifetime consuming very high intakes of these foods.

But for a host of well-known health reasons, it’s still wise to keep your intake of energy-dense nutrient-poor foods to a minimum.


Blind peer review

This is a fair and accurate assessment of the observational research that links higher intakes of ultra-processed foods with higher risk of cancer. – Tim Crowe


 

 

 

This article is part of a syndicated news program via
research check: will eating ‘ultra-processed’ foods give you cancer?
tagg gig guide - add event

A HITCH TO THE STICKS FESTIVAL ANNOUNCE LOCAL ARTIST LINEUP + VERY SPECIAL INTERNATIONAL GUEST

0
a hitch to the sticks festival announce local artist lineup + very special international guest
Hitch to the stitch
a hitch to the sticks festival announce local artist lineup + very special international guest

a hitch to the sticks festival announce local artist lineup + very special international guest

 A HITCH TO THE STICKS FESTIVAL ANNOUNCE LOCAL ARTIST LINEUP + ONE VERY SPECIAL INTERNATIONAL GUEST
 

MUSICAL SAFARI / CULTURE / DISCOVERY / TRAVEL / ADVENTURE

3 days, 10 music events, 30 musical acts, 710km, 1 bus

a hitch to the sticks festival announce local artist lineup + very special international guest

Ever imagined you could jam around the campfire with Whitfield Crane from Ugly Kid Joe, or go on an artist hunt in one of the largest hedgemazes in the southern hemisphere? A Hitch to the Sticks is this year’s newest Music Festival that promises you the ride of your life. Musician Dallas Frasca will host this musical safari and invites you to get on board the magical mystery tour. 
 
Already announced to join Frasca on the first A Hitch to the Sticks Festival bus is Melbourne Ska Orchestra’s all-round reggae luminary Nicky Bomba and Beechworth-born singer songwriter Liv Cartledge as part of the promised regional talent. Dallas is now thrilled to announce that international superstar Whitfield Crane from Ugly Kid Joe will perform a once in a lifetime intimate set somewhere along the Hume which is bound to be a musical highlight for 2018.
 
For the rest of the lineup the main focus is on supporting Australian and homegrown North Eastern Victorian talent. The festival is made up with 85% of up-and-coming musical gems who will share the stage with the likes of Jeff Lang,  Monique Brumby, Jo Jo Smith, Tay Oskee. Representing for the North East across the  weekend will be local artists Benny Williams, Dj Eddy and Rambunctious, Mandy Connell, Whiskey Dram, The Quick & The Dead, Rhyece O’Neill & The Narodniks, Droid, Rick Steward & the Greensmen, Marisa Quigley, Sara Flint, Time Rob & The Stealing Hours Band, Mikaylah & Leticia plus more to be announced. 
 
For 50 lucky ticket holders the adventure will begin in Melbourne’s CBD on Friday 16 March at 5.30pm and head North up the Hume stopping at a series of curated events before returning to the big smoke at 6.00pm Sunday 18 March. With six secret locations and four public events where you’ll get a chance to mix with the locals, the bus will take punters to Violet Town, Lima, Myrrhee, Tatong, Thoona, Wangaratta and Moyhu for a packed weekend of music, culture, discovery and adventure. 3 days, 10 music events, 6 secret locations, 4 open to the public with 20+ acts and 710km all on one bus!
 

For those who can’t make it onboard, there are plenty of opportunities to join the disembarking passengers and meet the legendary bus at four public events throughout the tour. This includes the sixth annual Wangaratta Down By The River Festival – a free event offering a kaleidoscope of flavour, music, activity and culture curated by Frasca herself, as well gigs by local promoters The Musical Garden in Tatong, and King Valley Presents in Moyhu.
 

A HITCH TO THE STICKS FESTIVAL 2018
3 days | 10 music events | 30 acts | 710km | 1 bus
Friday 16 March – Sunday 18 March
North-East Victoria

ARTIST LINE UP

WHITFIELD CRANE, U.S.A – (UGLY KID JOE)
DALLAS FRASCA, JEFF LANG, NICKY BOMBA,
MONIQUE BRUMBY, JO JO SMITH, LIV CARTLEDGE, TAY OSKEE, MANDY CONNELL, DJ EDDY, RAMBUNCTIOUS, BENNY WILLIAMS, WHISKEY DRAM, THE QUICK & THE DEAD, RHYECE O’NEILL & THE NARODNIKS, DROID, RICK STEWARD & THE GREENSMEN, KERRYN FIELDS, MARISA QUIGLEY, SARA FLINT, TIME ROBB AND THE STEALING HOURS BAND, MIKAYLAH & LETICIA AND MORE TBA…

 

Tickets on sale now via www.ahitchtothesticks.com

Limited to only 50 tickets

Accommodation, travel and some food and drinks provided.
 

VIP Packages include: choose your own room, or Rock n roll slumber party + the ultimate mega bundle pack includes: tee/tote bag/stubby cooler/bottle opener

 

——– Original Message ——–

Subject: A HITCH TO THE STICKS FESTIVAL ANNOUNCE LOCAL ARTIST LINEUP + VERY SPECIAL INTERNATIONAL GUEST
Date: 21.02.2018 16:56
From: Sarah Guppy – This Much Talent <Sarah@thismuchtalent.net&gt;
To: <mick@tooraktimes.com.au&gt;

A HITCH TO THE STICKS FESTIVAL ANNOUNCE LOCAL ARTIST LINEUP + VERY SPECIAL INTERNATIONAL GUEST

A HITCH TO THE STICKS FESTIVAL ANNOUNCE LOCAL ARTIST LINEUP +  VERY SPECIAL INTERNATIONAL GUEST
View this email in your browser
a hitch to the sticks festival announce local artist lineup + very special international guest

 A HITCH TO THE STICKS FESTIVAL ANNOUNCE LOCAL ARTIST LINEUP + ONE VERY SPECIAL INTERNATIONAL GUEST
 

MUSICAL SAFARI / CULTURE / DISCOVERY / TRAVEL / ADVENTURE

3 days, 10 music events, 30 musical acts, 710km, 1 bus

a hitch to the sticks festival announce local artist lineup + very special international guest

Ever imagined you could jam around the campfire with Whitfield Crane from Ugly Kid Joe, or go on an artist hunt in one of the largest hedgemazes in the southern hemisphere? A Hitch to the Sticks is this year’s newest Music Festival that promises you the ride of your life. Musician Dallas Frasca will host this musical safari and invites you to get on board the magical mystery tour. 
 
Already announced to join Frasca on the first A Hitch to the Sticks Festival bus is Melbourne Ska Orchestra’s all-round reggae luminary Nicky Bomba and Beechworth-born singer songwriter Liv Cartledge as part of the promised regional talent. Dallas is now thrilled to announce that international superstar Whitfield Crane from Ugly Kid Joe will perform a once in a lifetime intimate set somewhere along the Hume which is bound to be a musical highlight for 2018.
 
For the rest of the lineup the main focus is on supporting Australian and homegrown North Eastern Victorian talent. The festival is made up with 85% of up-and-coming musical gems who will share the stage with the likes of Jeff Lang,  Monique Brumby, Jo Jo Smith, Tay Oskee. Representing for the North East across the  weekend will be local artists Benny Williams, Dj Eddy and Rambunctious, Mandy Connell, Whiskey Dram, The Quick & The Dead, Rhyece O’Neill & The Narodniks, Droid, Rick Steward & the Greensmen, Marisa Quigley, Sara Flint, Time Rob & The Stealing Hours Band, Mikaylah & Leticia plus more to be announced. 
 
For 50 lucky ticket holders the adventure will begin in Melbourne’s CBD on Friday 16 March at 5.30pm and head North up the Hume stopping at a series of curated events before returning to the big smoke at 6.00pm Sunday 18 March. With six secret locations and four public events where you’ll get a chance to mix with the locals, the bus will take punters to Violet Town, Lima, Myrrhee, Tatong, Thoona, Wangaratta and Moyhu for a packed weekend of music, culture, discovery and adventure. 3 days, 10 music events, 6 secret locations, 4 open to the public with 20+ acts and 710km all on one bus!
 

For those who can’t make it onboard, there are plenty of opportunities to join the disembarking passengers and meet the legendary bus at four public events throughout the tour. This includes the sixth annual Wangaratta Down By The River Festival – a free event offering a kaleidoscope of flavour, music, activity and culture curated by Frasca herself, as well gigs by local promoters The Musical Garden in Tatong, and King Valley Presents in Moyhu.
 

A HITCH TO THE STICKS FESTIVAL 2018
3 days | 10 music events | 30 acts | 710km | 1 bus
Friday 16 March – Sunday 18 March
North-East Victoria

ARTIST LINE UP

WHITFIELD CRANE, U.S.A – (UGLY KID JOE)
DALLAS FRASCA, JEFF LANG, NICKY BOMBA,
MONIQUE BRUMBY, JO JO SMITH, LIV CARTLEDGE, TAY OSKEE, MANDY CONNELL, DJ EDDY, RAMBUNCTIOUS, BENNY WILLIAMS, WHISKEY DRAM, THE QUICK & THE DEAD, RHYECE O’NEILL & THE NARODNIKS, DROID, RICK STEWARD & THE GREENSMEN, KERRYN FIELDS, MARISA QUIGLEY, SARA FLINT, TIME ROBB AND THE STEALING HOURS BAND, MIKAYLAH & LETICIA AND MORE TBA…

 

Tickets on sale now via www.ahitchtothesticks.com
Limited to only 50 tickets
Accommodation, travel and some food and drinks provided.

 

VIP Packages include: choose your own room, or Rock n roll slumber party + the ultimate mega bundle pack includes: tee/tote bag/stubby cooler/bottle opener

 

ALL MEDIA ENQUIRIES: info@ahitchtothesticks.com

a hitch to the sticks festival announce local artist lineup + very special international guest

 
DOWNLOAD ARTISTS PRESS SHOTS
a hitch to the sticks festival announce local artist lineup + very special international guest Twitter
a hitch to the sticks festival announce local artist lineup + very special international guest Facebook
a hitch to the sticks festival announce local artist lineup + very special international guest Website
a hitch to the sticks festival announce local artist lineup + very special international guest Instagram
 
Copyright © 2016 This Much Talent, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
This Much Talent
15-25 Keele Street
Collingwood, Vic 3066

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list

a hitch to the sticks festival announce local artist lineup + very special international guest

tagg gig guide - add event

JULIARNA CLARK features with JMQ at The Water Rat Hotel ,This Thursday FEB 22 at 7PM. ALL WELCOME :-) And check out new program…

0
Juliarna Clark Features With Jmq At The Water Rat Hotel ,this Thursday Feb 22 At 7pm. All Welcome :-) And Check Out New Program…
juliarna clarke
Juliarna Clark Features With Jmq At The Water Rat Hotel ,this Thursday Feb 22 At 7pm. All Welcome :-) And Check Out New Program…
Juliarna Clark Features With Jmq At The Water Rat Hotel ,this Thursday Feb 22 At 7pm. All Welcome :-) And Check Out New Program…
Feb 2018


Dear Jazz Lovers,

This Thursday,  FEB 22, JMQ Jazz ensemble will feature Juliarna Clark at South Melbourne's welcoming Water Rat Hotel at 7PM

Juliarna is a jazz singer of great talent and artistry who brings warmth, elegance and humour to all her performances. A night out with 
her guarantees toe-tapping, marvelling, a few laughs and great memories of a fabulous night of music. The technical command she has 
over her voice comes from years of singing many different genres (classical, sacred, Irish, Brazilian and pop), with jazz being her main love. 
Juliarna’s broad jazz repertoire extends from Chick Corea and Jobim, to standards, to French jazz, and early jazz. 

She will perform with John Montesante, Michael Harding, Kim May, Tony Floyd and Aaron Michael.
You're in for a wonderful evening!  Not to be missed. ALL WELCOME!

Doors 6.30pm; Live Jazz 7pm. Bookings : 96861980 or www.thewaterrathotel.com.au
tagg gig guide - add event

UPCOMING EVENTS